Lorentz transformation- moving at speed of light

Lorentz tranformations suggest length contraction for the moving bodies which are concerned with the contraction in time as we move at realistivic speeds of light, as confirmed by Einstein in his special theory of realtivity. His theory is about velocity dependence of mass in which case mass is not mechanical mass but electromagnetic mass. So using electomangnetic mass he explains the failure of existence of ether in which a charged capacitor should not align perpendicular to the motion.

How electromagnetic fields are created by moving bodies is explained by Lorentz transformations. So observers in any intertial frames of reference must make communcation clear to each other with respect to motion of bodies relative to each other. This can be done by taking into considerations that the speed of aircraft for an oberver outside will be different than the pilot is reading inside. So we could prepare our case through galielian tansformations and then apply lorentz transofrmations for the sphere in which the light travels must have the same origin for the different observers in the different inertial frames.

At realistivic speeds the factor \scriptstyle{\sqrt{1-{v^2}/{c^2}}} becomes imaginary so the length contraction becomes infinite. Therefore to move at speeds of light ,which now is impossible but for interstellar travel is must, we must take into consideration the length contraction of the spaceship.

Advertisements

Nature versus Deity

Nature has to compete with a deity however imperfect he might be. We put our convenience partly in importance when we go to discover nature or a deity. We strikingly leave the panorama of nature to a scientific experiment waiting for nature to unfold herself in a way it deems to fit the experiment. There is not much room left for us to discover what we believe. But in the terms of religion we don’t have an experiment but led again by pure belief system to produce the system what we believe in. So the beliefs is what we discover are those what we think. Nature we have sought in science is what we have believed in and to defend it we term as the laws of nature. Newton or Einstein discovered what he thought not what the creator deems to think if there is one. Without a creator or a deity it is pretty obvious what we have discovered is what we have thought matching to what we have perceived so we have an illusion of knowledge.

So the question nature versus deity is a trivial question that has held significant importance in our scheme of things. In other words we are always at crossroads with our beliefs as is it a pure intuition of religion or mathematics or a scientific measurement of natural science it hardly matters what is the outcome. It had been painstakingly conserved our a period of time. So the true knowledge is the one that we transcend the universe or transcendental knowledge, The knowledge possessed by a deity when outside of the universe. Which could lead us to believe that without believing in a deity it is difficult to transcend and hence difficult to acquire true knowledge.

My Philosophy in nutshell-Tanscending Myth to Machine

Math01Man is fiction in the mind of God which is pure consciousness of the pure nature.It is called fictional existent and what occupies pure nature is fictional substance that is an abstraction from which flows the order of world and scheme of things which is substance with extension. In thought man is challenged by the consiousness of himself and thus proceeds to create a machine for his alter ego. As he creates his alter ego the fictional existent creates conflict with self-love and the man in confusion drifts with pursuits in science, arts and humanities.