The true essence of Himalayas

Himalayas are the alter ego of God as it is evident in its beauty as in its loftiness. If God had beauty it would commensurate with the beauty of the Himalayas. The Himalayas means the abode of snow. It is with the God spirit that Pandit Jawaharl Lal Nehru, the first prime minister of India empathized with Himalayas where his ashes was spread upon his death.

The becoming of universal spirit is the essence of the Himalayas. What does spirituality of the man means? Oneness with the cosmic spirit and so the Himalayas does the proxy of the cosmic spirit on the earth.

What is matter is the differentiation between various particles but the form of Himalayas seems to unite the matter into one holistic spirit. It could mean that the Himalayas is the personification of spirit that could exist in the matter. It is not animism that things have spirit, it is spiritualism that matter has one cosmic spirit.

It is because of the aloofness from the worldly ties that man thinks of intermingling with the cosmic spirit that in the past men or sages in search of Knowledge visited the Himalayas. The Himalayas represents the purity of thought hence towering imagination, the source of knowledge and the possession of beauty.

The more important expect of the Himalayas is the transcendence from the worldly ties hence going beyond matter into the world beyond where there rules the one true Brahman the self, as the cosmic seed, representing the oneness of the cosmos. To plunge into such oneness by overcoming the rigors of weather and life, the sages seem to amass knowledge of being with the God. So Knowledge is of two types, one that of matter and the other that of spirit while the former is immanent, the latter is transcendental . So it is the becoming of a transcendental spirit that the true essence of Himalayas lies in.


Which is beautiful nature or work of art?

Nature is the representation of reality that is the object of any subjective understanding of the Universe. In a matter of perception, the object of nature different from thinking being could be subsumed under nature itself. Then the question arises about human nature which is the instantiation of nature within the thinking being. So nature as being is present within the thinking being as an idea, the object of understanding.

Now is the nature more beautiful than the work of art which is the understanding of reality? So put in other words is the painting of Van Gogh more beautiful than nature as we understand than nature itself? The painting of Van Gogh deals with the meaning lent to nature which in general sense is meaningless. Nature, the study of which is though meaningless so when a Physicist studies nature, he is struggling with meaning, looking for finding meaning. The same is true of Van Gogh who lends meaning to nature. Now is this meaning beautiful than the meaningless nature? Indeed the sunset is beautiful but it is meaningless but when an artist paints the nature he lends meaning to it. Indeed meaning is more desirable than meaninglessness. So nature as painted appears beautiful than the sunset in reality.


The Feast

For the eyes, feast is with the festoons,
For beating heart, love is with the ruling roost,
There is hesitation and then a break-dance,
Mayonaise on the chicken lollipop drips,
and deepens the tongue to flicker
for the Birthday boy,
while fascinating June and August fly,
to the next stage of mime,
Shadows moving through love tunnel,
love nonetheless is a garb of the soul,
soul searches first memory then imagination,
and then the universe,
To find the feast for the eyes,
like those little balloons inflating the love within,
love beats like a butterfly in the afternoon,
finding the essence to mix the lilies and poppies,
only to find the feast as a spread for the eyes,
and the days pass by like unknowing,
cat hunts for the rat,
while the eye met and forgot,
the feast, a dying raconteur,
tells the tale of the moon,
lost southwards and in the garden,
with a click found on your collar


Why the modern religion was born?

A marriage of beauty with morality so that beauty could be tamed is the sole purpose of society at large. The basic instinct yields to us that beauty is far more superior to reason that you cannot find any reason for the thing of beauty to be beautiful. The society doesn’t yield to nature that beauty is the sole criterion of demarcation of reality and as such walks in the world of Physics, the study of nature whereby reason is made stronger than aesthetics.

Then society makes us moral. Why is there religion but to oppose the ancient myths of beauty that the ancient men found in Mythology? The Church thus is born. What the Emperor of Rome, Nero wanted to curtail was that beauty no longer belonged to the Church that he despised the church so much that he set Rome on fire for he feared the ghost of beauty would engulf Rome.

The will though denies beauty its claims to high society for the volition is jealous of the beauty as the church and gives rise to the demons in society. The whole problem of the mankind to apprehend its alter ego is the prejudice against beauty. Keats had said a thing of beauty is a joy forever, hinting the pleasure borne off a beautiful thing is almost eternal in its length. The church as thus wanted to overcome the will of man that it put in charge the morality as the safeguard so much that any appreciation of art or aesthetic judgment is considered as sin or the carnal pleasure.

The sole criterion for the religion to be present in the world is the beauty of nature which the religion has denied even though in terms of reason as was in the case of Galileo. The religion is there in retaliation to beauty as such it preached the immortality of the soul as opposed to the carnal sin of the body. The body is viewed as the source of appreciating beauty hence the originator of sins. The beauty of nature is likewise nullified by the religion for it inspires Romanticism that goes against the will of Church.

Thus the religion is there out of sole reason of curtailing beauty.


Metaphysics of cellular automata- Digital model of the universe

Cellular automata is a discrete time based step evolution of  cells depending upon the condition of neighbouring grids. The postulate of cellular automata assumes life is digital inside the living organisms as when we listen to music there is digital firing of neurons inside our brain. Now why cellular automata is important that it predicts the model of universe which is essentially digital yet conforming to the laws of thermodynamics that there is increase in disorder with the passage of time.

The life in the universe from consciousness to bacteria has evolved through discrete steps that laid the survival conditions in such a way that could be predicted by a computer algorithm but difficult to verify in reality.

The whole metaphysics deals with cellular nodes, space and time. Matter is represented by cellular nodes that create an illusion of space around the universe. The nodes are the matter that is distinct from space. The particles of matter are cellular gliders that move through the space whether at quantum level or at celestial level and the whole movement is tracked by the giant celestial computer having many computational cycles.

Now each observer runs his or her own celestial network and all inhabit a universe of their own with the laws of nature dictated by the cellular computation which indeed clearly describes all the nodes. This thus satisfies Einstein’s theory of relativity while still managing the Newtonian physics at each node level.

The whole theory of Cellular Automata is thus based on quantum entanglement and the wave collapse function. The quantum entanglement says each node or point in universe engages other point in a series of engagements such as possessing opposite spin to the other point separated by huge distance. So it makes sense that an observer might be having an entanglement with a far point in the space. So the cellular nodes engage in the quantum entanglement. So one point or cellular node communicates its spin naturally to the other that has opposite spin without ever sending or transmitting any information. Thus the state of the system is self-evident.


What Einstein meant by God does not play dice

Einstein once famously remarked “God does not play dice with the universe”. But what he meant by that is the strongest criticism of physical science with Quantum mechanics as the discipline of Physics under question. What he really meant could be summarized in a hypothesis that does guarantee according Einstein how to approach the subject matter of Physics. His chief points concerning the above saying could be summarized as follows.

  1. Game of dice is a game of chance as opposed to the  experimental method of physical science verifying the scientific speculation of the theory.
  2. As such a finite mind is limited to know the reality of the universe in the body of the omnicomplete work of science and if the mind in question employs a method as likely as a game of dice, the mind nodubtedly be unable to verify the theory according to experimental verification.
  3. The game of dice thus misapplies the omnipotent knowledge to the object of understanding.
  4. The object of understanding of science is like a God, complete and omniscient.
  5. From the above reasoning Einstein concluded the Quantum physics like the game of dice uses probability to measure the object of understanding , which is God in nature thus concluding Quantum Physics is incapable of any worthwhile study of physical science.

But that is not the case so, though probability is used to estimate the position and momentum of particle, the state of particle is clearly described as a position and momentum number though it means that both position and momentum cannot be determined simultaneously. Either there is a particle or momentum but if there is momentum though relativity assumes we are sure there is particle, in Quantum Physics we cannot be sure if there is particle in spite of knowing its momentum. That is the uncertainty Einstein implied.