Given the laws of nature everything is predetermined even our fate. So is the universe boring? Yes it is. Apart from the freedom we think we have we might not be free at all. We might be compelled by nature itself to behave like we do. We are bound by our brain to known substances that react in a particular way and as such we all have  a predisposition , the way we are. Given our inclination we are more or less captive of our own nature. However I might try I cannot bear comedy movies. So my fate is predetermined with what I choose which Schopenhauer called ‘will’ and what I call nature.

Nature is quite different from volition or will in the sense it seeks reason more passionately than mere choice. I choose what I get but that was already wired into me. Hence I know my choice before hand. Now most of us play games with nature as trying to get what we desire and spend life in utter misery since its quite boring to seek what we already desire and to make it interesting we introduce the stimuli of ‘money’, another caveat for our dismal show as far as our intellect is concerned.

However interesting we might make our life by playing games with ourselves, there is a purpose for which we might not be cut out for, LOVE,  like loving everyone around us, which seems preposterous but that kills the boredom of playing games with oneself in getting status, position, even knowledge or power. In fact however powerful Hitler might have been, he was captive of his own device, pre-programmed to take humanity to doom.

Two things stand out in first place the universe is an illogical place to be and we make it possible through struggle with logic. Secondly as we struggle with logic, simplicity soon becomes unmanageable and it turns into complexity.

Prior to Big Bang

Laws of nature were set at Big Bang, ‘nothing’ mattered only prior to these laws. The laws define space and time-the forms for existence, hence the concrete universal. What is abstract is still ‘half-nothing’ as it does have content but no form. ‘Nothing’ that existed prior to Big Bang had no content and no form ,which could not be put into a proposition as it would have form then. So no proposition existed with the abstract ‘half-nothing’. So half-nothing has no place in logical space. Thus abstract has no place in the universal and must be existing elsewhere in ‘nothing’. Hence abstract time and space must be existing in the ‘half-nothing’ that is prior to Big Bang.

At Big Bang

Big Bang is illogical to begin with as it assumes a singularity where time is undefined and when the time becomes defined we immediately face infinite time that is eternity looming large in front of us. The instance of abstract time is made and abstract space gives place to real space. So God Particle manifested.

After Big Bang

The whole becoming from the first state till now the world has been illogical.So the world is illogical to begin with but thought or man struggles against all odds to bring in logic into the world. It is logic that we yet to see illogical in the very essence of creation though the creation to begin with was illogical. Thus we make logic to replace what could have been illogical to start with.

If we exclude God from existence we are left with logic about the illogical which is not a desirable state-of-affairs for the civilisation. Hence the illogical could be replaced by the logic of God, as logic is necessary to replace illogic, God is necessary to replace nothingness which could be the state of the universe prior to Big-Bang. Logic of God says there is supreme being as opposing nothingness like logic replacing illogic. Light replacing darkness. Knowledge replacing ignorance. God replacing nothingness.

Conclusion Big Bang must have a creator. Stephen Hawking imagines something is ‘nothing’ when actually ‘nothing is something’ whose opposite is God. That calls for parallel universes and God is massive than ever.